1.
The State vs. Jameel Khan
FIR No.194/2023 dated 03.04.2025, under Sections 9(1)3C CNSA, registered at Police Station Tarnol Islamabad
On April 3, 2023, at approximately 8:08 PM, a police party on patrol at Marchan Stop apprehended Jameel Khan. Upon a personal search, the police recovered 1,030 grams of Charras from a blue shopper he was carrying. A 10-gram sample was separated for laboratory analysis, and the remaining 1,020 grams were sealed as case property. Mr. Tarique Ali Mastoi Learned Deputy District Public Prosecutor on the behalf of Federal Criminal Prosecution prosecuted case against the accused and successfully established a "strong nexus" between the accused and the recovered drugs. The court found Jameel Khan guilty beyond reasonable doubt and Convicted accused Under Section 9(1)3C of the CNSA, 1997 for 09 years of Rigorous Imprisonment (R.I.) and Fine: Rs. 400,000 (failure to pay results in an additional 04 months of Simple Imprisonment). The Federal Criminal Prosecution Service, under the leadership of Federal Prosecutor General, remains steadfast and determined in upholding the motive of erradictation of crimes effecting the society.
State VS Jameel Khan (FIR No.194/2023)
2.
STATE VS SHAHID MEHMOOD & OTHERS FIR NO:27/2013
DATED:01-03-2013 - U/S: 302/324/337 FV/337- D, 148,149 PPC
In the instant case a poor man (chowkidar) Muhammad Rafique was murdered with a fire shot landed on his chest by the accused Shahid Mehmood with his kilashankov recovered from him on his pointation by the police. Accused Shahid Mahmood was charged with murder of the said deceased by the Honorable Court of Session u/s 365D Cr. PC after submission of several police reports u/s 173 Cr.PC. Trial against accused was prosecuted by the senior ADPP of the FCPS Mr. NAZAR IQBAL. During Trial Prosecution produced 34 witnesses with unrebutted, cogent, coherent and trustworthy ocular and medical evidence to establish a case beyond any shadow of doubt keeping in view vision of founder of FCPS Mr. Ghulam Sarwar Nihaug (fair trial, rule of law and justice). Our Senior Prosecutor Mr. Nazar Iqbal exercising his expertise in criminal Law has successfully secured a conviction against accused with sentence of Death and Compensation amounting 20,0000 Lacks U/S 544-A Cr. PC subject to the confirmation of the Honorable Islamabad High Court. Prosecutors of FCPS under the exemplary leadership of Federal Prosecutor General are committed to uphold Justice and redress the grievances of innocent victims.
STATE VS SHAHID MEHMOOD & OTHERS
3.
The State vs. Muhammad Bilal
FIR No.798/2023 dated 19.10.2023, under Section 376-III PPC, registered at Police Station Shehzad Town, Islamabad.
On October 19, 2023, at approximately 4:00 PM, within the jurisdiction of P.S. Shehzad Town, the accused Muhammad Bilal committed rape of a minor victim aged about 04 years inside an under-construction house at Hamdani Town. The complainant heard the victim's cries, rushed to the spot, and saw the accused fleeing from the grey structure. The victim was found in a distressed condition and was shifted to PIMS Hospital. The prosecution produced 20 witnesses including the complainant, the minor victim, medical officers, PFSA forensic analysts, and investigation officers. The DNA and Serology analysis report of PFSA confirmed the presence of the accused's seminal material on the victim's clothing and vaginal swabs, with a match probability of approximately one in 2.6 sextillion. The victim and complainant successfully identified the accused during a test identification parade conducted at Adyala Jail. Mr. Muhammad Aslam, Learned Special Public Prosecutor on behalf of Federal Criminal Prosecution prosecuted the case against the accused and successfully established the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The court found Muhammad Bilal guilty and convicted him under Section 376-III PPC, awarding Death Sentence (to be hanged by neck till dead) and Fine: Rs. 100,000 (failure to pay results in an additional 06 months of Simple Imprisonment). The death sentence is subject to confirmation by the Honourable Islamabad High Court. The Federal Criminal Prosecution Service, under the leadership of Federal Prosecutor General, remains steadfast and determined in upholding the motive of eradication of crimes affecting the society.
State VS Muhammad Bilal (FIR No.798/2023)
4.
The State vs. Gull Nawaz
FIR No.113/2025 dated 21.04.2025, under Sections 376-III/511 PPC, registered at Police Station Phulgran, Islamabad.
On April 21, 2025, at approximately 3:30 PM, within the area of Madrassa Soorat Ul Quran Academy, the accused Gull Nawaz, who was employed as a Qari at the said academy, sexually abused a minor victim aged about 05 years by putting something in her mouth. The victim's mother had left her children at the academy for Quran education. When the children returned home, the victim appeared frightened and her brother Azlan narrated the incident to their mother, following which the complainant (victim's uncle) lodged a report at P.S. Phulgran. The prosecution produced 13 witnesses including the minor victim, the complainant, the victim's mother, medical officers, PFSA forensic analysts, and the investigating officer. The DNA and Serology analysis report of PFSA confirmed the presence of spermatozoa on the victim's clothing, and the DNA profile of the accused Gull Nawaz could not be excluded as a contributor, with a statistical probability of approximately 309.3 quadrillion times more likely than an unrelated individual. While the Court extended benefit of doubt to the accused on the charge under Section 376-III/511 PPC due to the absence of unequivocal proof of penetration or its clear attempt, the totality of evidence established that the accused committed an unnatural sexual offence against the minor victim. Mr. Muhammad Aslam, Learned Special Public Prosecutor on behalf of Federal Criminal Prosecution prosecuted the case against the accused. The court found Gull Nawaz guilty and convicted him under Sections 377-A/377-B PPC, awarding 14 years of Rigorous Imprisonment (R.I.) and Fine: Rs. 1,000,000 (failure to pay results in an additional 09 months of Simple Imprisonment). Benefit of Section 382-B Cr.P.C was extended to the convict.
State VS Gull Nawaz (FIR No.1132025)
5. THE STATE VS ZAHIR KHAN ALIAS ZAHEER CHITTA & NAILA ,FIR No. 2016, Dated 27-2-2024, Offence U/S 302, 201 and 34 PPC
In the instant case Victim/Deceased Shah Zaman aged about 28 years was murdered by the accused Zahir Khan Alias Zaheer Chitta and accused Naila with firearms shot on the vital part of the deceased body i.e. Head in furtherance of their common intention. Police reports under section 173 Cr.P.C after completion of investigation were submitted before Honorable court of Session and both the accused were charge sheeted accordingly U/S 302, 201,34 PPC. The instant case was prosecuted by Mr. Atif Rehman Ranjha (ADPP). Prosecution produced 14 witnesses and all of them were cross-examined by the defense counsel but defense counsel could not create any dent, doubt or major Discrepancy in prosecution evidence. The instant case is of circumstantial evidence for which prosecution successfully established the chain of evidence i.e. ocular account, motive, recoveries and positive forensic reports; that the prosecution proved its case against both the accused beyond any shadow of doubt through concrete and cogent evidence by exercising criminal expertise. As per the medical evidence three fire shots of 30 bore Pistol were fired on the Vital part of the body of the deceased i.e. head which caused death of the deceased. The time between injury and death was approximately 3 to 5 minutes as per medical evidence. Crime weapon (pistol 30 bore) and (Motorcycle) of deceased on which deceased on the date of occurrence went to the market both were recovered from the house of the accused Zahir Khan alias zaheer chitta on his Pointation. Two empties of Pistol 30 bore and one live bullet got recovered from place of occurrence. CDR as a substantial piece of evidence was produced on record by the prosecution which established nexus between accused Naila & Deceased and between both the accused at the relevant time.
The prosecution successfully built its case mainly on the basis of rule of res-gestae being the case of circumstantial evidence. The prosecution witnesses remained consistent, coherent and relevant during their respective depositions. Medical evidence was in line with ocular account. Recoveries and forensic reports fully supported the prosecution version. The nutshell of the above discussion is that the prosecution has successfully proved its case beyond shadow of any doubt up to the hilt of the guilt of both the accused Zahir Khan alias Zaheer Chitta & Naila who were held guilty of the commission of preplanned, pre-consulted, premeditated and intentional murder of Shah Zaman deceased, therefore, they are were convicted accordingly due to untired efforts and expertise of FCPS Prosecutor Mr. Atif Rehman Ranjha under the Leadership of Worthy Federal Prosecutor General
Accused Zahir Khan alias Zaheer Chitta was found guilty and sentenced to Death u/s 302-B PPC and with 5 lack compensation to the legal heirs of the deceased u/s 544-A Cr.PC. Accused Naila was found guilty and sentenced up to life imprisonment with 3 lack compensation to the legal heirs of the Deceased. FCPS Prosecutors under the leadership of Worthy Federal Prosecutor General are Committed to uphold Justice and fair trail according to Article 10-A of the constitution of Pakistan for all citizens.
THE STATE VS ZAHIR KHAN ALIAS ZAHEER CHITTA & NAILA FIR No. 2016
6. SANA YOUSAF SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCER CASE
THE STATE VS UMAR HAYAT -FIR NO: 370/25, UNDER SECTIONS 302/ 392/411/449 PPC, PS. Sumbal.
This case was prosecuted by Mr. Raja Naveed Hussain, Deputy District Public Prosecutor (DDPP), and Mr. Mazhar Bashir Khan, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP), on behalf of the State. The case attracted significant media attention due to the murder of social media influencer Sana Yousaf, aged about seventeen years, at her own home in Islamabad in the presence of two eyewitnesses. The accused, Umar Hayat, son of Amjad Javed, on 02.06.2025 at about 5:00 p.m., armed with a pistol, trespassed into the deceased’s house. The accused fired a shot from his pistol at the deceased with the intention of killing her, which struck her chest and injured her; she was subsequently shifted to PIMS Hospital, where she succumbed to her injuries. The accused fled the scene, taking one of the deceased’s mobile phones with him.
The accused was arrested from Amin Park, Jaranwala. He was traced through a contact saved under the name “Kaka” in the deceased’s other mobile phone; the details of this number were obtained through the IT lab, and police found that the number belonged to the accused, Umar Hayat. A .30-bore pistol, along with four live cartridges, was recovered from the accused on his disclosure and in the presence of witnesses, and he was unable to produce a valid licence for the weapon. The deceased’s missing mobile phone was recovered from the accused at the time of his arrest and was identified by witness Yousaf Hassan, the father of the deceased. A Toyota Fortuner bearing registration AYA-39, which the accused had used to travel to the deceased’s house intending to kill her, was recovered on his pointation from G-11 Markaz, Arcade Plaza. The accused was correctly identified in an identification parade by prosecution witnesses on 13.06.2025. He confessed his guilt under Section 164 Cr.P.C. before the Area Civil/Administrative (AC) and was thereafter sent to judicial lockup. A report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was subsequently prepared and submitted, and the trial court framed charges against the accused on 20.09.2025, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
The prosecution examined twenty-seven witnesses, and the evidence of all witnesses was found to be cogent, convincing, coherent, consistent, and relevant. The medical evidence was consistent with the ocular account, and the forensic evidence and recoveries fully supported the prosecution’s version. Although the accused retracted his confession, he was unable to establish that it had been made involuntarily. The judicial confession was corroborated by the medical evidence, the recoveries, and the motive. The prosecution also produced the accused’s fingerprints, lifted from a mirror in the deceased’s house, which were verified by NADRA and matched the fingerprints on his CNIC. According to the firearm report, the empty cartridges recovered from the place of occurrence were found to have been fired from the pistol recovered from the accused on his pointation. Both eyewitnesses testified, and their testimony was supported by the medical evidence and the accused’s confession, that the accused had fired two shots at the deceased’s chest.
Conclusion: In sum, the prosecution produced overwhelming evidence against the accused, including the testimony of two eyewitnesses, the testimony of witnesses regarding his renting of the vehicle, his journey to and from the place of occurrence, the commission of the murder, his judicial confession, the established motive, his fingerprints on the mirror found in the deceased’s house, and the recovery of both the rented vehicle and the pistol. The accused, having been refused by the deceased, murdered an innocent seventeen-year-old girl. He was sentenced to death under Section 302(b) PPC, along with compensation of two million rupees under Section 544-A Cr.P.C.
THE STATE VS UMAR HAYAT FIR NO: 370/25